Human Writing vs Fact-Check Workflow

Human Writing

By ClawHub Community

Write blog posts, marketing copy, and emails that sound like a real person wrote them.

Fact-Check Workflow

By James Anditis (Journalism)

Verify claims, gather evidence, and document findings with structured journalism standards.

Human Writing

• Writes content using simple, direct language instead of inflated corporate speak
• Avoids AI tells like 'delve,' 'pivotal,' 'tapestry,' and synonym cycling
• Uses contractions, lowercase headings, and natural sentence rhythms that sound human
• Checks drafts against a reference list of common AI writing patterns
• Focuses on concrete facts and specific details instead of vague generalizations

Fact-Check Workflow

• Extracts checkable claims from articles or statements and prioritizes them by importance
• Guides research through primary and secondary sources with documentation templates
• Provides rating scales (True, Mostly True, False, etc.) with clear criteria for each level
• Creates templates for contacting sources and giving right of response
• Organizes evidence collection with checklists for documents, data, and expert sources

Reach for Human Writing when…

• You're drafting a blog post, newsletter, or article for your company
• You need marketing copy or social media content that doesn't sound like a bot wrote it
• You're writing client-facing emails or website pages that need to feel authentic
• You want to edit existing content to remove AI-sounding phrases and make it more natural

Reach for Fact-Check Workflow when…

• You're publishing an article and need to verify facts before it goes live
• You're writing a dedicated fact-check piece rating someone's claims
• You need to document your verification process for editorial standards
• You're training a team on consistent fact-checking practices